Registered: 06/05/06
Posts: 14995
Loc: Portland, OR; USA
I'd like to see it added, however only the original author can add to it... Perhaps add a check to see how many posts are in the topic and if more than a few it won't allow?
Express Hosting
"We are the official hosting company of UBB.threads. Ask us about our free migration services to migrate your UBB.threads installation."
As far as sidebars I would like to see perms applied for reg and guest to at least active topics and posts. Some communities want people to be registered before displaying certain forums. The active topics and posts ignore perms and there for become useless for sites that need that.
I definately agree that I don't think I like the add a person to a private topic, but I really do like the idea of what gliderdad has said there. It is a pita for me if I want to use that because half of my forums are restricted to all but about 10 people. So I can't really use the active topic discussion one..
Registered: 06/07/06
Posts: 366
Loc: Tombstone, AZ
Originally Posted By: David Dreezer
Originally Posted By: Sirdude
edit: i can think of a case that would not present an issue. person creates a PM.. adds 5 users to it.. hits send...
then does a face palm and wants to make it 6 users.. he's screwed.. so there are times when it would be desireable. and not broach any privacy concerns
Delete, start over. You're adding features to make life easier, not to predict and make up for human fallibility.
Personally, I find the ability to add people very handy at times. You shouldn't be discussing things with someone anyway if you think there is a possibility that person might add the name of someone you're gabbing about. In my opinion it should be left, but changed so that you can disable or enable it to your own likes. Why take something away that another uses all the time? I used it quite frequently to discuss different ideas of what I want to do with the forums and only want a certain few to know about it in the early stages. Much easier than created yet another "admin" or "moderator" type group for only a couple of people. Just my 2 cents worth.
This means that there is no real content inside that forum, but the forum name serves to link to whatever URL has been defined.
Additionally, prior to actually taking the user to the destination, a hit is logged to the DB to count 'redirects' for forum display ( cfrm ) purposes
If I understand you correctly Sirdude, when you click on the defined URL it will take you to that forum page containing the defined website, a kind of implementation of a browser engine which allows you to display the URL within the forum post. If not then could this be something that could be added to your 7.6 list.......
_________________________
Naz. [The world is big enough for everyone - so be HAPPY ]
"Searching will allow by topic only or by body only, but not both"
>> Don't see the real reason. If it's speed-related then why not add as info "this will cause a slow search"
"since people rarely change the subject or the posting icon"
>> Indeed, we even edit that feature out. Would it be possible to make these items optional? Also as standard, even when removing ALL icons from the CP, you always have the option of a blank or the book.gif. It'd be nice to actually be able to limit to one single icon (and then not show the choice). (It's just we don't want a christmas tree forum.)
Oh and... good luck executing those plans in the time frame you've set yourselves. I would be extremely impressed.