|
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 64
journeyman
|
journeyman
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 64 |
Several times when I merge threads the threads just disappear... they merge into limbo or something 
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 6,633 Likes: 85
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 6,633 Likes: 85 |
What version are you using and what method to merge? Edit the post and select merge or inline moderation.
Blue Man Group There is no such thing as stupid questions. Just stupid answers
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 64
journeyman
|
journeyman
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 64 |
I use 7.5.3 I was just merging threads into one and all of them went puff, or to limbo, or who knows... I just can not find them...
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 9,242 Likes: 1
Former Developer
|
Former Developer
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 9,242 Likes: 1 |
One thing to note is that they are currently ordered by their original post id. So if you're merging a thread into a thread it's possible that they will show up earlier in the target thread rather than at the end.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 64
journeyman
|
journeyman
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 64 |
I just can not find them... do you mean that even if the last post was within half an hour... after they are merged they will not show when searching for recent posts? I must say that what i did was pick the number of the post where to merge... then searched and found 2 or three threads I wanted to merge into that one. I merged them all and then can not find any of them. The post I merged to may not have been the first on the thread and I may pressed "back" to go to the other threads to merge. The post to where I was merging can not be found either
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 6,633 Likes: 85
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 6,633 Likes: 85 |
Well it seems to work okay for me I am on 7.5.3 Next time you merge try using the pointer option so you can see where it is moved to. Or not moved to.
Blue Man Group There is no such thing as stupid questions. Just stupid answers
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 64
journeyman
|
journeyman
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 64 |
OK It happened to me again the threads did not merge, they vanished!!! I searched threads on the same topic, founf 4 or 5 picked a post number on the first thread and then merged the other theads into the first... Went back with the browser instead of making a new search On the third try the whole thing was gone The markers that indicate the threads were merged where there but only took me to a message "can not be found" The posts cpuld no longer be found via a search... or in any pother way This is ridiculous  Lost a lot of posts I wanted to save and have together... merging is supposed to put theads you care about into one... it should not make the info you want in one place get deleted... Why is this happenening and where do the posts go? I may have merged a thread into an already merged thread or into itself by mistake... but that should not delete everything... should it? Something is wrong with the merge feature sometimes...
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 6,633 Likes: 85
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 6,633 Likes: 85 |
Did you enable the pointer option when merging? Is that what you are talking about with "Markers" If so I think it is time to open a support ticket at UBB. So Rick can take a peek. It could be a bug or it could be something else.
But I think if Rick can help, you would need to be more specific on what you did to merge the posts and what posts were merged. Meaning post id numbers, were you merging a reply to a post or the topic and or all replies.
There are a few different ways to merge topics and replies so it could be just the method you are using that is the issue. That is why you need to be a little more specific when submitting a ticket.
Blue Man Group There is no such thing as stupid questions. Just stupid answers
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 4,057
|
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 4,057 |
This is something ive been angry over too. Ive waited and waited since the option was created.
It just doesnt work. If you accept the fact that its broken then your half way there.
Ive found after a merge, if they go missing look for the date of the last post from the merge group and you will find it in the topic your merging it into, but obvioulsy not where you wanted it to be.
Apparently in v8 how ever many 8 dot dot dots there will be before its over hauled.
If you switch to threaded mode, you can see where the breaks are in the construction of the post.
Ive spent more than a day on splitting and patching back together topics to make them legal.
Its a feature that shouldnt even be listed. Sorry but true.
BOOM !! Version v7.6.1.1 People who inspire me Isaac ME Gizmo
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 9,242 Likes: 1
Former Developer
|
Former Developer
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 9,242 Likes: 1 |
I think you guys are thinking of this more as an "append tool", where one topic is appended to the other, when it truly is a merge.
The merge tool itself isn't going to be overhauled because that's what a merge is, you just merge the 2 topics together.
There will, however, probably be a new option for appending where the topic you are moving will be appended to the end of the target topic.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 4,057
|
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 4,057 |
appending sounds good  Bare in mind we've never had a manual to explain in detail what "Merge" really is or does. Do you really want me to dig out my old topic about this? its a big one. Merge : Why ask the post number you want to land it with, when it doesn't land there evey time. It lands with a date match. And not a post match. You said you were going to look at this. As it couldnt work as it should in its current state. its unreliable when splitting and merging. I know Ive been trying to get it right for years. The Move Merge function is not a working reliable function. Mark, splitting a topic gets to be a pain because it depends on who each one replied to. If everyone replies to the original post, it's easy. If everyone replies to the last post, it's easy. But if anyone uses quickquote or quickreply from an individual post anywhere in the thread it can create a thread with multiple branches.
That's where it tends to end up messy, since you'll move one post and might end up with half the thread coming along with it. Move one of those out and you might end up with the same thing.
When it comes to moving, if you really want to see what ones are coming with it, a good way for now is to pop over to threaded mode and you can see all the replies that are on that particular branch you're going to be splitting off. It's part of the beast of needing to support threaded mode. When you move a post it has to take it's replies along with it. When we redo the UI, we'll probably redo this where you can do some sort of inline moderation. Maybe checking off posts in a topic as you're reading them and then have some options to do something with all of the checked, move, delete, etc. Taken from this Thread https://www.ubbcentral.com/forums/u...7/7_4_1_Move_Merge_Topic.html#Post220517I love search 
BOOM !! Version v7.6.1.1 People who inspire me Isaac ME Gizmo
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 9,242 Likes: 1
Former Developer
|
Former Developer
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 9,242 Likes: 1 |
Yeah, I looked through the old topics on this, and one thing I'm doing with version 8 is trying not to rush features, and make sure they are done right even if it means having to spend more time. So, while it would be quicker to just nuke the current merge and alter it to an append I won't end up doing that since some people are accustomed to it and may want it to stay that way.
So, what we'll be looking at is a merge and an append, with the added ability to only move certain posts instead of having to move an entire branch like I mentioned in the quote.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 16,378 Likes: 129
|
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 16,378 Likes: 129 |
I'd rather have it done right than done fast... I'm sure we could all agree no?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 4,057
|
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 4,057 |
Splitting Works No Problem and it works really well, i never had that feature in classic so i do like it, its great for clearing up spam etc.
Its if you want to put stuff back into a thread. it can land at the topic number you ask. Or it can land at the date of the moving post.
I know we go on an on about them (bugs), but we have to mention them to make the product a good all round product.
BOOM !! Version v7.6.1.1 People who inspire me Isaac ME Gizmo
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 6
stranger
|
stranger
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 6 |
I just removed the 'Merge' option from our board. If you merge a post or thread with another, but accidentally use the post number of the one you are trying to move... the code deletes the old TOPIC, which at this time is itself. The post is still in the database, but it no longer has a TOPIC and can't be seen outside of the database.
7.4.2 (I know we are behind a bit) scripts/domovepost.inc.php scripts/domovethread.inc.php
// If this post was the original topic, then we need to delete it if ($post_is_topic) { $query = " delete from {$config['TABLE_PREFIX']}TOPICS where TOPIC_ID = ? "; $dbh->do_placeholder_query($query,array($old_topic_id),__LINE__,__FILE__); } // end if
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 9,242 Likes: 1
Former Developer
|
Former Developer
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 9,242 Likes: 1 |
Hmm, I'll need to make sure we have that patched up. Thanks for the info!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 6
stranger
|
stranger
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 6 |
Inline Moderation Merging prevents this.
The 'scripts/inline_moderation.inc.php' file has code to prevent this and won't let you merge onto yourself.
There seems to also be a problem splitting a merged post. So, I am preventing any merging.
Last edited by Lrae; 11/09/2009 10:03 PM.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 91
journeyman
|
journeyman
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 91 |
Are there any issues with merging forums together? Thanks.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 170
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 170 |
Was this issue with threads disappearing when merging ever fixed? Is there a way to recover the lost threads from the database?
UBB user since 1998
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 3,940 Likes: 1
Former Developer
|
Former Developer
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 3,940 Likes: 1 |
yes, you can recover lost threads and have them reappear in a designated forum.. Yarp posted a mod @ ubbdev for this... i have used it too  CAVEAT... when a merge fails, it's usually NOT recoverable... things really get deleted! sooo, this is for stray posts with no TOPIC home, really 
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 170
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 170 |
Thank you! I will give that a try.
UBB user since 1998
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 170
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 170 |
The script worked great. I recovered the threads to a private forum and then moved them to the appropriate public forum. I am not really sure if they got moved however as they don't seem to show up for searches. (There are several thousand threads in the forum so the recovered threads do not "jump out" at you - not easy to find.)
Is there something that needs to be done to have these threads indexed? Any idea?
I am using the MSQL Full Text search on the board.
UBB user since 1998
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 6
stranger
|
stranger
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 6 |
We are in the process of doing the 7.5.6 upgrade and I see the bug when one accidently merges a post onto itself is still there. Causing the post/thread to delete itself.
Robin
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 3,940 Likes: 1
Former Developer
|
Former Developer
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 3,940 Likes: 1 |
|
|
|
1 members (Gizmo),
103
guests, and
103
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|