Well Dave, dividing a 500+ meg posts.sql table into two sure sounds better than leaving everything in a single table. Surely you can come up with a more constructive answer than that, perhaps even offer your professional view on what would work best here.
? I'm agreeing that a separate archive table is a good idea. It would get rarely used, wouldn't get stuck in memory, wouldn't get scanned often, would be a good idea.
I don't understand why you responded as you did when I'm agreeing with you, Conrad.
![[Linked Image from navaho.infopop.cc]](http://navaho.infopop.cc/progress.gif)
