Originally Posted by gizmo
I fail to see why we have to fix IE's shotty interpretation of CSS when the *official* standards state how it SHOULD work and M$ decides to be inventive on how they want things to work

Well concerning the above post I agree with you Gizmo that it is a bit aggressive and I apologize. Since I'm not currently a Moderator I can not modify the original posting, but here below hopefully is a better rendition of what I meant the post to be.


If FF was following the standard that many advocates of FF claim, then it would pass the ACID2 test, but it does not currently pass that test.

Customer Satisfaction is the issue at hand as I view it, and has nothing to do with what browser anyone prefers over another.

If I want to sell someone something and it works great for me, but fails to work for them, they're not going to buy it from me.

That to me is why UBBT authors should be concerned about fixing it and not just waiting for some day
to see if Microsoft will fix IE to correct this and other issues.