Yes I understand that programs work differently.

Sorry for my nagging here.. but I feel its important to me and maybe you missed my question or I was unclear.

Quote
The GD2 image became 1920x1440 px in full size
http://www.britbike.com/forums/gallery/32/full/2630.jpg

the imagemagick image became 3264 × 2448 px in full size
http://www.britbike.com/forums/gallery/32/full/2631.jpg

Wonder why did GD2 resize the image 2630.jpg down to 1920x1440 px and IM 2631.jpg down only to 3264 × 2448 px?
I used the same original photo and the gallery setting for full image is "1920".
I understand if you don't know why but my point is that I also want the IM to resize it down to "1920"

PLEASE NOTICE NEW INFO
I noticed when I also uploaded the original image in a forum that it was same size 3264 × 2448 px as the IMAGEMagig image in the gallery.
It had not resized the image but ONLY compressed it in the Gallery using IM!!!

original photo thread
http://www.britbike.com/forums/ubbthreads.php?ubb=showflat&Number=702898#Post702898
original photo
http://www.britbike.com/forums/ubbthreads.php?ubb=download&Number=2632&filename=IMG_0982.JPG

Does this help you in the analyse? maybe a bug or maybe a fault in my end.

Thanks for any input


Last edited by Morgan; 07/26/2017 4:17 PM.
Morgan Johansson
BritBike Forum
https://www.britbike.com/forums/ubbthreads.php