|
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 120
Member
|
|
Member
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 120 |
Whoops... I tried disabling the threads and posts columns to make some room for side panels as I found these useful... but then I realised I couldn't find those settings anymore. Ehm... they gone? Guide me...
(If they're gone... I don't really care, just trying to find them ;))
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 16,532 Likes: 150
|
|
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 16,532 Likes: 150 |
threads and posts columns Not quite sure what you mean
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,659 Likes: 1
Pooh-Bah
|
|
Pooh-Bah
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,659 Likes: 1 |
threads and posts columns Not quite sure what you mean I'm assuming the columns in CFRM with the # of posts and threads  PS - Now why does THAT quote have a scrollbar?
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 16,532 Likes: 150
|
|
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 16,532 Likes: 150 |
It has a scrollbar due to the quoted quote box; the "ie fix" HAD to define a size; so it makes everything else suck  .
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 3,839 Likes: 1
Carpal Tunnel
|
|
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 3,839 Likes: 1 |
The only method for quotes was better - can't say I am a fan of this method - sorry 
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 16,532 Likes: 150
|
|
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 16,532 Likes: 150 |
I dislike this method as well, I MUCH preferred the old method  ... This method makes baby jesus cry :nod:
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,659 Likes: 1
Pooh-Bah
|
|
Pooh-Bah
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,659 Likes: 1 |
Baby Jesus crying makes me cry. *sniff*
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 16,532 Likes: 150
|
|
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 16,532 Likes: 150 |
Baby Jesus crying makes me cry. *sniff* :nod: lol was hoping one of you would chime in lol
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,659 Likes: 1
Pooh-Bah
|
|
Pooh-Bah
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,659 Likes: 1 |
Now why does THAT post scroll?? Oh yeah.... :/ 
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 16,532 Likes: 150
|
|
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 16,532 Likes: 150 |
what post?  .. prolly cas of allens post
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 3,839 Likes: 1
Carpal Tunnel
|
|
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 3,839 Likes: 1 |
don't blame poor Allen 
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 16,532 Likes: 150
|
|
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 16,532 Likes: 150 |
I think he needs a spanking...
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 120
Member
|
|
Member
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 120 |
threads and posts columns Not quite sure what you mean I'm assuming the columns in CFRM with the # of posts and threads  PS - Now why does THAT quote have a scrollbar? Yes to the one-but-last line.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 120
Member
|
|
Member
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 120 |
PS - when my board users see this scrollbar piramyd they'll have a good time... 
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 16,532 Likes: 150
|
|
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 16,532 Likes: 150 |
I love the old functionality, where they'd work off of percentages and get smaller; I hate the IE7 compatability that adds scrollbars to EVERY quote 
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 9,242 Likes: 1
Former Developer
|
|
Former Developer
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 9,242 Likes: 1 |
Like I said in the announcement, the style changes for the quote/code/php changes are optional. You don't *have* to make them if you're not worried about IE not overflowing properly 
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 16,532 Likes: 150
|
|
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 16,532 Likes: 150 |
Yeh, but I don't want to have to maintian two sets of styles for those crazy enough to want the "new" options 
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 3,097 Likes: 1
Carpal Tunnel
|
|
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 3,097 Likes: 1 |
Could actually easily add on the fly code or settings that allow each user the choice of how they want it to operate.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 16,532 Likes: 150
|
|
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 16,532 Likes: 150 |
or useragent match for "bonkers" browsers 
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 3,839 Likes: 1
Carpal Tunnel
|
|
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 3,839 Likes: 1 |
we should go back to the old method as standard 
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 16,532 Likes: 150
|
|
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 16,532 Likes: 150 |
we should go back to the old method as standard  can a brotha get an "amen" 
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,659 Likes: 1
Pooh-Bah
|
|
Pooh-Bah
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,659 Likes: 1 |
Some encouraging usage stats on my board for January, especially since mine is a very non-technical audience:
60.9% MSIE
IE6 37.8%
IE7 22.6%
IE5 .2%
25.3% Firefox
FF2 13.5%
FF1.5 8.3%
FF1 2.9%
10.1% Unknown
01.2% Safari
01.1% Opera
00.9% Mozilla
00.1% Netscape
<0.1% Others
As for the IE "fix" issue... if it looks bad in IE anyway, and it's forcing FF to look just as bad, then I say roll back to the real way and have a user-option to wrap wide posts. Unless, of course, there's a better way to handle it... PS - Can we change the default HEIGHT of the CODE tag to make it taller? I don't think my chart above is too unreasonable to post all at once w/o scrolling. 
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 16,532 Likes: 150
|
|
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 16,532 Likes: 150 |
Mine on UGN: MSIE 478253 43.3 %
Msie 7.0.5730.11 No 317 0 %
Msie 7.0 No 104794 9.5 %
Msie 6.1 No 47 0 %
Msie 6.00 No 1 0 %
Msie 6.0.2900.2180 No 405 0 %
Msie 6.0.2800.1106 No 1 0 %
Msie 6.0 No 366451 33.2 %
Msie 5.5 No 3051 0.2 %
Msie 5.23 No 517 0 %
Msie 5.22 No 79 0 %
Msie 5.21 No 2 0 %
Msie 5.2 No 1 0 %
Msie 5.17 No 60 0 %
Msie 5.16 No 10 0 %
Msie 5.14 No 81 0 %
Msie 5.13 No 65 0 %
Msie 5.12 No 71 0 %
Msie 5.01 No 1055 0 %
Msie 5.00 No 3 0 %
Msie 5.0 No 917 0 %
Msie 4.5 No 4 0 %
Msie 4.01 No 279 0 %
Msie 4.0 No 12 0 %
Msie 3.02 No 3 0 %
Msie 2.0 No 27 0 %
FIREFOX 242095 21.9 %
Firefox 3.0 No 1 0 %
Firefox 2.0.0.2 No 8 0 %
Firefox 2.0.0.1 No 43759 3.9 %
Firefox 2.0.0.0 No 3 0 %
Firefox 2.0 No 72506 6.5 %
Firefox 2 No 2 0 %
Firefox 1.9.0.1 No 1 0 %
Firefox 1.6 No 44 0 %
Firefox 1.5.2 No 1 0 %
Firefox 1.5.0.9 No 31680 2.8 %
Firefox 1.5.0.8 No 69159 6.2 %
Firefox 1.5.0.7 No 3888 0.3 %
Firefox 1.5.0.6 No 1671 0.1 %
Firefox 1.5.0.5 No 304 0 %
Firefox 1.5.0.4 No 1320 0.1 %
Firefox 1.5.0.3 No 803 0 %
Firefox 1.5.0.2 No 208 0 %
Firefox 1.5.0.1 No 1127 0.1 %
Firefox 1.5.0. No 3 0 %
Firefox 1.5.0 No 3 0 %
Firefox 1.5 No 758 0 %
Firefox 1.4.1 No 2 0 %
Firefox 1.4 No 12 0 %
Firefox 1.0.8 No 36 0 %
Firefox 1.0.7 No 7297 0.6 %
Firefox 1.0.6 No 2413 0.2 %
Firefox 1.0.5 No 56 0 %
Firefox 1.0.4 No 1771 0.1 %
Firefox 1.0.3 No 419 0 %
Firefox 1.0.2 No 302 0 %
Firefox 1.0.1 No 228 0 %
Firefox 1.0. No 4 0 %
Firefox 1.0 No 1599 0.1 %
Firefox 0.9.6 No 18 0 %
Firefox 0.9.3 No 75 0 %
Firefox 0.9.2 No 31 0 %
Firefox 0.9.1 No 16 0 %
Firefox 0.9 No 5 0 %
Firefox 0.8.0 No 3 0 %
Firefox 0.8 No 91 0 %
Firefox 0.10.1 No 363 0 %
Firefox 0.10 No 105 0 %
NETSCAPE 4087 0.3 %
Netscape 8.1.2 No 608 0 %
Netscape 8.1 No 108 0 %
Netscape 8.0.4 No 172 0 %
Netscape 8.0.3.4 No 70 0 %
Netscape 8.0.3.3 No 47 0 %
Netscape 8.0.2 No 1 0 %
Netscape 8.0.1 No 29 0 %
Netscape 8.0 No 4 0 %
Netscape 7.2 No 1142 0.1 %
Netscape 7.1 No 451 0 %
Netscape 7.02 No 54 0 %
Netscape 7.01 No 16 0 %
Netscape 7.0 No 162 0 %
Netscape 6.2.3 No 1 0 %
Netscape 6.2.2 No 3 0 %
Netscape 6.2.1 No 69 0 %
Netscape 5.0 No 322 0 %
Netscape 4.79 No 19 0 %
Netscape 4.77 No 1 0 %
Netscape 4.76 No 48 0 %
Netscape 4.75 No 33 0 %
Netscape 4.7 No 2 0 %
Netscape 4.61 No 13 0 %
Netscape 4.5 No 32 0 %
Netscape 4.08 No 1 0 %
Netscape 4.07 No 1 0 %
Netscape 4.05 No 1 0 %
Netscape 4.0 No 633 0 %
Netscape 3.01 No 8 0 %
Netscape 3.0 No 4 0 %
Netscape 0.91 No 29 0 %
Netscape 0.6 No 3 0 %
Others 377909 34.2 %
Unknown ? 325543 29.5 %
Safari No 21159 1.9 %
Opera No 18740 1.7 %
Mozilla No 9839 0.8 %
Camino No 653 0 %
Konqueror No 497 0 %
GetRight No 374 0 %
LibWWW No 213 0 %
Debian APT No 184 0 %
K-Meleon No 106 0 %
OmniWeb No 89 0 %
Firebird (Old Firefox) No 82 0 %
Curl Yes 79 0 %
WebCollage (PDA/Phone browser) No 45 0 %
Phoenix No 42 0 %
Galeon No 38 0 %
MultiZilla No 31 0 %
Nokia Browser (PDA/Phone browser) No 30 0 %
Sony/Ericsson Browser (PDA/Phone browser) No 30 0 %
Links No 22 0 %
iBrowse No 18 0 %
WebTV browser No 17 0 %
Acrobat Yes 12 0 %
Wget Yes 11 0 %
ANT Fresco No 10 0 %
TelePort Pro Yes 8 0 %
NetNewsWire No 8 0 %
Dillo No 7 0 %
UP.Browser (PDA/Phone browser) No 6 0 %
NetPositive No 5 0 %
w3m No 4 0 %
Lynx No 3 0 %
Motorola Browser (PDA/Phone browser) No 1 0 %
Real player or compatible (media player) No 1 0 %
AmigaVoyager No 1 0 %
Lotus Notes web client No 1 0 %
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 3,097 Likes: 1
Carpal Tunnel
|
|
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 3,097 Likes: 1 |
Okay who the heck is browsing with Lynx on your site
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 16,532 Likes: 150
|
|
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 16,532 Likes: 150 |
lol i know several of my advanced linux users do just to read news from work (as my site is a 'security risk' according to their IT staff)
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,659 Likes: 1
Pooh-Bah
|
|
Pooh-Bah
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,659 Likes: 1 |
Next time I won't spend the time to summarize my results. 
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 16,532 Likes: 150
|
|
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 16,532 Likes: 150 |
haha, figured since we where sharing browser stats  .. I can get you stats from a gardening forum if that'd do you any good lol, that forum is like 80X bigger than mine lol
|
|
|
|
0 members (),
225
guests, and
88
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|