Unfortunately, with the transition to user numbers, the posters name is no longer stored in the post. It would be too intense when people changed names.
I've had a bit of negative feedback about this as well.
Here was Rick's official response when I first asked:
</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="">quote:</font><hr /><font size="" face="">Unfortunately, the Re: Username isn't going to be possible. Since we no longer store the username in the posts table it would require another JOIN against the user's table to find out what the user's display name is. There's already one join against that crosses the users/posts table and this would make it even more complex. An unfortunate side-effect of going to user numbers for everything. This was the only thing I wasn't able to resolve.
</font><hr /></blockquote><font size="" face="">Now if you've noticed. Clicking on the subject will open a window with the post that its in reply to. Also, hovering over that link will show you "Re: #4099" which means in reply to post number 4099 (or whatever). Glance up at the post numbers, and you'll see what post they are replying to.
It's almost there.... with great speed improvements. It just takes some getting used to.
My users just posted a small "list" and this was on it.
</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="">quote:</font><hr /><font size="" face="">Not seeing who you're replying to. I understand why the change was made, but i'm going to miss being able to tell which comment people are replying to...especially when it's a popular thread and people are making various comments.</font><hr /></blockquote><font size="" face="">It's helped once I've explained the trick about hovering the mouse over the subject link.
<img border="0" title="" alt="[Wink]" src="images/icons/wink.gif" />
Josh
Measurection.com Admin |
ThreadsDev.com Moderator
Register to see my
How To/Site Help Library Forum at ThreadsDev.com.
My threads 'tweaking' abilities are for hire.[This message was edited by JoshPet on March 15, 2003 at 10:45 AM.]